• Ешқандай Нәтиже Табылған Жоқ

Youth entrepreneurship in the Republic of Kazakhstan: concept, problems and solutions


Academic year: 2022

Share "Youth entrepreneurship in the Republic of Kazakhstan: concept, problems and solutions"


Толық мәтін


UDC: 334.012.6

D.N. Aitzhanova1*, М.М. Begentayev2, S.К. Kunyazova3, А.А. Titkov4 Toraighyrov University, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan

1aytzhanova.di@mail.ru, 2mey74@mail.ru, 3kunjazovas@mail.ru, 4alexey-pvl@mail.ru

1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2811-2461, 2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9688-4370,

3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5538-5839, 4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9126-2337

1Scopus Author ID: 6504799201, 3Scopus Author ID: 57190215854. 4Scopus Author ID: 57216909808

Youth entrepreneurship in the Republic of Kazakhstan: concept, problems and solutions Abstract

Object: The inclusion of the younger generation in entrepreneurial activities is one of the solutions to the problem of employment, especially aggravated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Considering the importance of the development of youth entrepreneurship for the processes of innovative transformation of the economy, as well as the relevance of managing the process of social adaptation of young people, involving them in creative activities and providing opportu- nities for maximum personal self-realization, it can be argued that the mechanism for supporting and developing youth entrepreneurship is a central element in solving social and economic development of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The purpose of this study is to analyze the causes of youth unemployment in order to determine the variable forms and types of youth entrepreneurship aimed at solving the problems of youth employment.

Methods: The collected theoretical and practical data on the cause-and-effect factors of the functioning of youth entrepreneurship were analyzed using the methods of system analysis, structuring information, building hypotheses and polling.

Findings: On the basis of scientific approaches to understanding the structural elements of youth, the conceptual essence of youth was systematized, an objective approach to the concept of youth entrepreneurship was determined, which was considered in accordance with its target, aimed at carrying out entrepreneurial activities. Moreover, the cause-and-effect factors of the development of youth entrepreneurship have been determined, a classification of youth entrepreneurship has been developed according to the main types. Through a survey the situation on the labor market regarding the problems of the development of youth entrepreneurship was studied and ways of solving the problem of youth unemployment were proposed.

Conclusions: A clear systematization of scientific approaches to the concept of youth entrepreneurship, identifica- tion of the causes of youth unemployment, problems of the development of youth entrepreneurship will ensure the pro- gressive development of youth entrepreneurship to achieve full employment of youth and the population in the labor market.

Keywords: youth, youth entrepreneurship, business and entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial activity, unemployment, employment, classification, innovative activity, competitiveness.


In modern conditions of the development of a market economy in the Republic of Kazakhstan the prob- lems of small and medium-sized businesses are becoming especially acute. It is this sector of the economy that is assigned the main role in the formation of a middle class capable of becoming a reliable support for the industrial and innovative development of Kazakhstani society. A necessary strategic resource for the de- velopment of small and medium-sized businesses is active youth employment and youth entrepreneurship.

The allocation of youth entrepreneurship as a special segment of entrepreneurship occurs because, un- like other types of entrepreneurship, it has its own specific features: innovative activity, innovative thinking;

mobility, flexibility of approaches, quick response to the development of new markets; the ability to con- stantly update knowledge and skills in accordance with changing production and market requirements; the ability of young people to withstand the increased work and nervous stress that accompanies entrepreneurial activity, especially at its initial stage; risk predisposition of young people.

At the macroeconomic level, youth entrepreneurship in the Republic of Kazakhstan has, on the one hand, socio-economic foundations, and on the other hand, institutional foundations. The socio-economic foundations of youth entrepreneurship involve solving the social problems of youth, ensuring stable em- ployment and income for this category of the population. Institutional foundations indicate that youth entre- preneurship is not just a socio-economic phenomenon, but also become an important and significant institu-

* Corresponding author.

E-mail address: aytzhanova.di@mail.ru




Youth entrepreneurship in the Republic of Kazakhstan:…

ECONOMY Series. № 2(102)/2021 5

tion of the market economy, which at a certain stage ensures economic growth, innovation and competitive- ness of the economic system.

At the present stage the issues of the formation and development of youth entrepreneurship in the Re- public of Kazakhstan remain poorly researched, there are no clear boundaries of the conceptual apparatus of youth entrepreneurship, its types, problem-target priorities of reform.

Literature Review

E.G. Shumik, E.V. Belik, M.P. Blinov (2017) believe that the term trends in the formation and devel- opment of youth entrepreneurship are directly related to the age of the participants in this process.

A.V. Ivanova (2013), N.V. Akhiyarova (2009) give directly subjective age limits of youth entrepreneur- ship, in such a range as 30–35 years, arguing that the this group of society has the maximum potential for innovative ideas. K. Mannheim (2010) considers youth as a reserve of human resources for adaptation to rap- idly changing economic and market conditions. According to the scientific views of K. Mannheim, youth is neither progressive nor conservative, but is considered as the potential for perception of a dynamically changing culture, civilization, and economy. C.R. McConnell and S.L. Brue (2009) believe that entrepre- neurship is a systemic dynamic process of connecting all types of available resources into a single process of producing a good or service. The main idea of K.R. McConnell and S.L. Bru focuses on the fact that the sought-for target landmark of entrepreneurship is the process of creation (production) of the final type of any product or service. In the future, the production process is complemented by a commercial (sales) process, which leads to education, making a profit. J. Schumpeter (1982) believes that entrepreneurship is the process of transforming a new idea or invention into a successful innovation. Entrepreneurs' innovation leads to long- term economic growth. Zh.M. Zhartai (2019) presented a methodological framework that makes it possible to analyze the qualitative and quantitative parameters of the development of youth entrepreneurship, which will increase the effectiveness of the implementation of state support for initiatives.

Zh.S. Khusainova, Zh.M. Zhartai (2020) developed the methodological foundations of the Foresight model for the development of youth entrepreneurship. We examined the main types of foresight and gave their characteristics, substantiated the position of increasing the effectiveness of the brainstorming method in relation to young entrepreneurs. Zh.M. Zhartai, Zh.S. Khusainova, B.S. Esengeldin (2020) presented an analysis of the development of youth entrepreneurship in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The results of the analysis will improve the efficiency of the mechanism for supporting young people engaged in entrepreneur- ial activity.


The key research methods were the methods of system analysis, structuring information, the statistical method of research, the method of constructing hypotheses, the method of polling. Systems analysis methods covered analytical and synthetic research methods. Within the framework of the analytical research method youth entrepreneurship as an economic category was considered in two components: the conceptual apparatus of youth and modern scientific approaches to understanding entrepreneurial activity. As a result, based on the analysis of terminology, a synthetic method was applied, which made it possible to develop a refined author's definition of youth entrepreneurship. On the basis of the method of structuring information, theoretical aspects were developed regarding the cause-and-effect factors of the emergence of youth entrepreneurship, its classification directions of systematization, including types. The search for practice- oriented information made it possible to simulate the current economic situation in the field of youth entrepreneurship in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The survey method made it possible to determine probabilistic forecasts and hypotheses for the development of youth entrepreneurship.


The term youth entrepreneurship, using the analytical research method, is relevant to consider taking in- to account two approaches: subjective and objective.

The subjective approach indicates that the main subject of youth entrepreneurship is youth.

In modern scientific periodicals, global information resources, youth is associated with a social-age group that has the following attributes:

 age range;

 certain status in society (V.A. Lukov, 2012).

The age range of young people is governed by the legal and regulatory framework of each country sepa- rately. In the complex, the average age range of young people varies within the following limits:




 the lower limit is 14–16 years old;

 the upper limit is 25–30 and higher.

When considering youth entrepreneurship, almost all scientists and researchers, both foreign and Ka- zakhstani, focus on the age qualification. So, for example, in a scientific study of scientists of the Russian Federation E.G. Shumik, E.V. Belik, M.P. Blinov, it is noted that the term trends in the formation and devel- opment of youth entrepreneurship are directly related to the age of participants in this process (E.G. Shumik, E.V. Belik, M.P. Blinov, 2017).

A number of other scientists, such as A.V. Ivanova, N.V. Akhiyarova, within the framework of their dissertation research directly give the subjective age boundaries of youth entrepreneurship in the range of 30–35 years, arguing that the this group of society has a maximum potential for innovative ideas (A.V. Ivanova; 2013, N.V. Akhiyarova, 2009).

Along with the age criteria of young people, this category of society is endowed with a certain qualita- tive status in society, which is characterized, on the one hand, by the transition from childhood to adoles- cence, and, on the other hand, by the emergence and growth of social responsibility.

The attribute of social responsibility is considered by the German sociologist K. Mannheim, who con- siders youth as a reserve of human resources for adaptation to rapidly changing economic and market condi- tions. According to the scientific views of K. Mannheim, youth is neither progressive nor conservative, but is considered as the potential for perception of a dynamically changing culture, civilization, economy (K. Mannheim, 2010).

An objective approach to considering the concept of youth entrepreneurship is focused on the main tar- get — entrepreneurial activity.

There are multifaceted scientific approaches to the concept of entrepreneurial activity, which in turn are delimited into historical stages.

Within the framework of the 20th century, the most accurate definition of entrepreneurship was pre- sented in the works of K.R. McConnell, S.L. Brue. According to these scientists, entrepreneurship is a sys- temic dynamic process of connecting all types of available resources into a single process of producing a product or service (McConnell K.R., Bru S.L., 2009).

The main idea of K.R. McConnell and S.L. Bru focuses on the fact that the sought-for target landmark of entrepreneurship is the process of creation (production) of the final type of any product or service. In the future, the production process is complemented by a commercial (sales) process, which leads to education, making a profit.

Another approach to the definition of entrepreneurship was put forward by the Austrian-American economist J. Schumpeter. According to him, entrepreneurship is the process of transforming a new idea or invention into a successful innovation. Creation of innovations by entrepreneurs leads to long-term economic growth (J.A. Schumpeter, 1982). Entrepreneurial activity is logically interconnected with the concept of

“business”. Despite the fact that in practice business and entrepreneurship are often identified, they have a different theoretical essence. Business is a systematic process of receiving, earning the accumulation of funds, both in entrepreneurial and other activities.

It should be noted that in most cases entrepreneurial activity is always associated with business as a re- sult. In the reverse order, a business may not always be entrepreneurial.

In the 21st century entrepreneurship has taken on new qualitative forms and targets. Along with busi- ness, the targets for entrepreneurial activity are:

 social goals;

 environmental goals;

 humanitarian goals (D. Bornshtein, 2015, T.V. Ershova, 2016).

In modern information sources there are general, logical, non-systematized concepts of entrepreneurial activity, which are focused on the ultimate goal — making a profit. So, for example, in Wikipedia (the free encyclopedia) entrepreneurship is interpreted as an independent activity of citizens, focused on the systemat- ic receipt of profit under the following conditions: use of property, sale of goods, performance of work, ser- vice; responsibility for risk; registration of an entrepreneur in accordance with the established procedure.

Analysis of approaches to the definition of entrepreneurship allows us to model the concept of this term, which is reflected in accordance with Figure 1.




Youth entrepreneurship in the Republic of Kazakhstan:…

ECONOMY Series. № 2(102)/2021 7

Figure 1. The main structural elements of the conceptual apparatus of entrepreneurship Note: compiled by the authors

The conceptual apparatus of youth entrepreneurship can be represented in accordance with the Figure 2.

Figure 2. The main structural elements of the conceptual apparatus of youth entrepreneurship Note: compiled by the authors

The main criteria for youth entrepreneurship are age qualifications and entrepreneurial ability. Similar approaches take place in scientific research of other scientists.

Thus, in the scientific presentations of Russian researchers it is noted that citizens under 35 are young entrepreneurs. In other information resources it is noted that youth entrepreneurship is a comprehensive sys- tem of measures aimed at accumulating entrepreneurial thinking, abilities, starting opportunities for an entre- preneurial activity and adapting to modern market relations among young people.

Youth entrepreneurship has its own cause-and-effect factors, which, in our opinion, should be divided into two areas:

 problems of youth employment (unemployment);

 striving to meet needs.

The dominant factor in the development of youth entrepreneurship is the problem of youth employment (unemployment).

Youth employment problems are most associated with natural unemployment, which in turn includes such subspecies as:

Social and age groups

Young entrepreneurship Socio-economic phenomenon

Entrepreneurship ability

Age of 18-35 Resource potential

Production of a product or service Commercialization process Social and age groups




 frictional unemployment;

 structural unemployment.

The natural level of unemployment is characterized by a situation in the labor market when the total number of citizens in search of work is roughly comparable to the total number of vacancies in enterprises, firms, companies and other organizations.

The natural unemployment rate is characterized by the following trends:

 the process of training (teaching young people in universities, colleges);

 the process of finding a job when moving from one job to another (frictional unemployment);

 the process of training and retraining of personnel, the search for a new job in connection with the closure and the emergence of new types of industries under the influence of factors of scientific and technological progress (structural unemployment).

Taking the above into account, it should be assumed that natural unemployment, including that inherent in young people, is inevitable and natural. Along with natural unemployment, youth employment problems can be associated with cyclical unemployment, which is directly dependent on the conjuncture cycles of the economic system. This type of unemployment is comparable to the problems of a significant economic downturn (K.R. McConnell, S.L. Brue, 2009).

The orientation of youth entrepreneurship in solving the problems of youth unemployment is touched upon in the scientific works of Kazakh scientists D.E. Mukhambetova, S.Ch. Primbetova, who note that youth entrepreneurship plays a certain role in solving social and economic problems (D.E. Mukhambetova, S.Ch. Primbetova, 2020).

Taken together, in general, the cause-and-effect factors of youth entrepreneurship are presented in Fig- ure 3.

Figure 3. Causal factors of youth entrepreneurship Note: compiled by the authors

Along with solving the problems of unemployment, youth entrepreneurship involves solving the prob- lems of meeting the initial basic economic needs, both their own and public. This leads to the development of the economic system, economic growth, increased innovation and competitiveness of the economy, in- cluding through the development of small and medium-sized businesses.

Young entrepreneurship Cause-effect factors Solving problems of employment (unem-

ployment) Natural unemployment

Frictional Structural Cyclic

Potential economic profits Development of the economic system

The economic growth Increasing innovation activity

Meeting the needs Individual needs of youth

Public needs Biological Material Social Spiritual Ethical Aesthetic

Increasing competitiveness Small and medium business development




Youth entrepreneurship in the Republic of Kazakhstan:…

ECONOMY Series. № 2(102)/2021 9

Classic types of entrepreneurship correspond to youth entrepreneurship. Basic types of youth entrepre- neurship are formed, in accordance with Figure 4, by subject matter and by organizational and legal form. By subject matter, youth entrepreneurship is subdivided into:

 industrial entrepreneurship — the target is the organization of the production of goods and services;

 commercial entrepreneurship — the target is trade and intermediary activities;

 financial entrepreneurship — the target is the provision of financial services (A.N. Asaul, 2009).

According to the organizational and legal form, youth entrepreneurship is divided into three types:

 sole ownership (individual entrepreneurship) — a form of entrepreneurial activity by one citizen in his own interests;

 partnership — conducting entrepreneurial activities in which two or more citizens agree on the own- ership and management of an economic entity;

 corporation — doing business, in which economic activity is based on share capital divided into shares owned by direct and indirect participants in the business process.

The optimal initial option for the development of youth entrepreneurship is individual entrepreneurship, which in the future, within the framework of development, can be transformed into a partnership or corpora- tion (joint stock company).

Figure 4. Classification and main types of youth entrepreneurship Note: compiled by the authors

The organizational and legal forms of youth entrepreneurship closely correlate with the types of entre- preneurial activity in terms of size:

 individual entrepreneurs, as a rule, form the sphere of small business (the number of employees is up to 50 people);

 partnerships can correspond to both the sphere of small and medium-sized businesses (the number of employees is from 50 to 500 people);

 corporations are identified with large-scale entrepreneurship (the number of employees is more than 500 people).

An important type of youth entrepreneurship forms a subjective attribute. Within the framework of this feature, the following types of youth entrepreneurship should be designated:

Classification and types of youth entrepreneurship By organizational

and legal form Sole ownership

Partnership Corporation By subject matter

Manufacturing entrepreneur- ship

Commercial entrepreneurship Financial entrepreneurship

On an objective basis Classic entrepreneurship Innovative entrepreneurship

On a subjective basis Company

Firm Farms To size

Small business Medium business

Large business




 enterprises — organizations performing one or more functions for the production and distribution of goods and services in the country's economy;

 firms — organizations owning and managing the activities of two or more enterprises;

 farms — enterprises in the system of the agrarian complex.

It should be noted that the basic postulate of the formation and development of youth entrepreneurship is the creation of small businesses.

On an objective basis, youth entrepreneurship can be implemented both in the classical and in the inno- vative format, which provides for:

 manifestation of leadership qualities and generation of new ideas;

 production and release of innovative goods and services;

 improvement of existing goods and services on the market;

 application of innovative business models in the practice of entrepreneurial activity;

 a systemic focus on innovative management and marketing;

 the use of innovative technologies in production.

Studying and analyzing the main scientific approaches to understanding the essence and economic role of youth entrepreneurship, we can conclude that youth entrepreneurship is an integral element of traditional entrepreneurial activity and forms a kind of reserve and potential for production opportunities, economic growth, innovation and competitiveness of the country's economy. Youth entrepreneurship is implemented through variable forms, types and is focused both on meeting social needs and on solving problems of youth employment. The dynamic progressive development of youth entrepreneurship contributes to the achieve- ment of a progressive level of natural unemployment and full employment of young people and the popula- tion in the labor market.

As for the study of the situation in the Republic of Kazakhstan, the economic characteristics of the pop- ulation aged 15–34 in the Republic of Kazakhstan are presented in accordance with Table 1.

Table 1. Economic characteristics of the population aged 15–34 years in the Republic of Kazakhstan

Indicator 2016 2017 2018 2019

Labor force, person 3 993 400 3 975 100 4 022 900 3 955 700

The share of the labor force in the total labor force, % 44,38 44,03 44,02 42,9

Employed population, people 3 780 300 3 768 500 3 807 200 3 753 300

Employees, people 2 896 000 2 909 000 2 974 000 2 900 000

Self-employed, person 884 300 859 400 833 400 853 700

Nominal unemployment rate, % 5,34 5,2 5,36 5,12

Real unemployment rate, % 32,53 32,16 30,89 31,29

Note: compiled by the authors on the basis of Statistical compilations “Demographic Yearbook of Kazakhstan”, “Employment in Kazakhstan”

The unemployment rate can be reduced by developing youth entrepreneurship. Among the problems that hinder the development of youth entrepreneurship are:

 personal or motivational difficulties of young people (Larchenko A.V., 2015);

 lack of professional and specific knowledge in the field of entrepreneurship, theoretical support and experience (Laricheva A.A., 2014; Petrishche V.I., 2015).

 the lack of a clear legislative definition of the concept of “youth entrepreneurship” and, as a conse- quence, the impossibility of identifying its subjects for the purposes of accounting and analysis, which pre- vents an objective assessment of the effectiveness of the legislative and executive measures taken (A.O. Zhidikova, M.S. Rakitina 2014; V.I. Ignatov, 2015).

As part of the study, a survey was conducted among student youth of the Pavlodar region. The survey involved 600 schoolchildren, undergraduate and graduate students, of whom 450 were girls and 150 were boys.

The conducted research has shown that more than 54 % of the respondents are interested in organiz- ing their own business. At the same time, 30 students already have a business, 202 students plan to do business during their studies, 95 — after studies; the rest believe that they will not engage in entrepre- neurial activity (Figure 5).




ECONOMY S Note: compil

Thus, high. 60 % showed that the current ists and the dustries, ser their jobs du

Mecha broad areas

 gene

 mech In orde cial role is a tion is carri the employm seekers.

State e and supply young peop The le of Kazakhst ple in colleg In the lowing task

 deve updating tak

 creat

 supp

 orga

 expa tions of v B. Yessenge

Series. № 2(1 Figure 5. T led by the auth on the part o

of students s t students mo situation in t

existing dem rvices and e ue to their ag anisms for pr


eral mechanis hanisms focu er to reduce assigned to “ ed out betwe ment center employment

of labor, pro ple, register th

ading elemen tan, in accor ges and univ Republic of ks are solved elopment and king into acc ting conditio port for the n nization and ansion of inte vocational e

eldin, 2020).

Do not engage in


02)/2021 The structure o


of young peo starting from ostly do not the youth lab mand for lab ducation has ge, and the n

romoting yo sms for the f used on yout youth unem

“employmen een entrepren

owns a data centers, in a ovide informa

he unemploy nt of the gen rdance with F

ersities unde f Kazakhstan at a systema d implementa count the situ ons for increa on-state sect d developmen

ernational co education (Z


t plan to n business 5%

of students for ople, the leve m the 3rd–4th

work in thei bor market is bor in the lab s acquired a ecessary infl outh employm

formation of th participatio mployment in

t centers”. T neurs and un abase of job addition to h

ation on the yed and pay b neral mechan Figure 6, is t er the program n, when train

atic level:

ation of state uation on the asing the ava tor of vocatio nt of social p ooperation o Zh.S. Khusai


r forecasting t el of those in h year alread ir specialty ( s the imbalan bor market. C systemic an lux of young ment in the R

youth emplo on in busines infrastructur The employm nemployed or b vacancies f elp in findin required pro benefits at th nisms for the the training o

ms of profes ning youth in e general edu e labor marke ailability of v onal educatio partnership in on training an

inova, Zh.M

uth entrepren

the conduct of terested in o dy earn extra (J.M. Zhartai nce in the pr Currently the nd problemat g people is no Republic of oyment;

ss entreprene re terms, fro ment center is r hired work from differen ng a job, carr ofessions, pro he expense o e formation o

of profession sional, highe n the framew ucational stan

et and structu vocational ed


n the vocatio nd retraining M. Zhartai, 2

Have business 5%

Plan to business 1

eurship in the

f entrepreneur rganizing the a money. At

i, 2019). One rofessional tr

e situation w tic nature. L ot observed.



om a theoreti s a specialize kers looking f nt companie ry out a gene ovide vocatio

f the state bu of youth emp nal personnel er and postgr work of vocat ndards for vo ural changes ducation;

nal education g of personne 2020; Z. Zh

Enga d

engage in s after study 16%

Republic of K

rial activity.

eir own busi the same tim e of the main raining of yo with the staff Long-term w

can be divid

ical point of ed place in w for a new job es and a data eral study of onal guidanc udget.

ployment in t l (training of raduate educ tional educat ocational edu in the econo

n system;

el in educati hartay, Z. K

age in business during study




iness is quite me, the study n reasons for oung special- f in many in- workers leave ded into two

view, a spe- which media- b. Typically, abase of job f the demand ce, retraining the Republic f young peo-


tion, the fol- ucation, their omy;

ional institu- Khussainova, e y r - - e o

- - , b d g c - - r

- ,




Figure 6. Modern mechanisms to promote youth employment in the Republic of Kazakhstan Note: compiled by the authors

Along with the general mechanisms for ensuring employment and employment of youth, in the Repub- lic of Kazakhstan the formation of mechanisms focused on the participation of youth in business entrepre- neurship is considered as a strategic direction. These mechanisms provide for:

- organization of activities and functioning of regional business incubators;

- functioning of republican youth associations, associations aimed at the development of youth entre- preneurship;

- formation of the infrastructure of consulting and financial support for youth entrepreneurship;

- development of the activities of entrepreneurial universities.


Summarizing the above, it should be noted that motivational reasons, starting conditions for young peo- ple, state support are not sufficient conditions for starting a business. Young people often lack basic knowledge to run their own business. The development of youth entrepreneurship will be facilitated by the process of integrating the interests of educational institutions, entrepreneurs, the population (the public) and public authorities, which will achieve a synergistic effect.

To solve the problems of youth entrepreneurship the state should involve civil society institutions, pub- lic and non-profit organizations, and entrepreneurs themselves. At the same time, it is important to under- stand that young people should be a direct participant in the solution of regional problems and should not be exclusively in the role of an object of education, training and socialization. These measures, in our opinion, will contribute to the development of youth entrepreneurship, creating comfortable conditions for it; the state, in turn, can initiate the mass attraction of young people to entrepreneurial activity.


Asaul, A.N. (2009). Organizaciya predprinimatelskoi deyatelnosti [Organization of business activities]. Saint Peters- burg: ANO IPEV [in Russian].

Ahiyarova, N.V. (2009). Socialno-upravlencheskie problemy gosudarstvennoj podderzhki molodezhnogo predprinimatelstva v Respublike Bashkortostan [Social and administrative problems of state support of youth entre- preneurship in the Republic of Bashkortostan]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Ufa [in Russian].

Bornshtejn, D. (2015). Kak izmenit mir. Socialnoe predprinimatelstvo i sila novyh idei [How to Change the World: So- cial Entrepreneurs and the Power of New Ideas]. Мoscow: Alpina Publisher [in Russian].




Youth entrepreneurship in the Republic of Kazakhstan:…

ECONOMY Series. № 2(102)/2021 13

Demograficheskij ezhegodnik Kazahstana. 2020: stat. sb. [Demographic Yearbook of Kazakhstan]. (2020). Nur-Sultan [in Russian].

Ershova, T.V. (2016). Ekologicheskoe predprinimatelstvo: osnovnye napravleniya i etapy razvitiya issledovanii [Envi- ronmental entrepreneurship: main directions and stages of research development]. Vestnik SPbGU, Ser. 8, Menedzhment — Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Ser. 8. Management, 1, 66–90 [in Russian].

Zhartaj, Zh.M. (2019). Analiz kolichestvennyh i kachestvennyh parametrov razvitiya molodezhnogo predprinimatelstva v Respublike Kazahstan [Analysis of quantitative and qualitative parameters of the development of youth entrepre- neurship in the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Vestnik Karagandinskogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskaya seriya — Kara- ganda University Bulletin Economic Series, 96–4, 312–324 [in Russian].

Zhartay, Z., Khussainova, Z., Yessengeldin, B. (2020). Journal Development of the youth entrepreneurship: Example of Kazakhstan. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(1), 1190–1208. Doi: 10.9770/jesi.2020.8.1(80) [in Eng- lish].

Zhidikova, A.O., Rakitina, M.S. (2014). Innovacionnoe molodezhnoe predprinimatelstvo kak forma razvitiya grazhdanskogo obshchestva [Innovative youth entrepreneurship as a form of civil society development]. Youth poli- cy and civil society in modern Russia: Nauchno-prakticheskaya konferenciya — Scientific and practical conference.

(pp. 45–50). Rostov na/Donu [in Russian].

Ivanova, A.V. (2013). Kompleksnaya ocenka faktorov razvitiya molodezhnogo predprinimatelstva v universitetskoi srede [Comprehensive assessment of the factors for the development of youth entrepreneurship in the university en- vironment]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Ekaterinburg [in Russian].

Ignatov, V.I. (2015). Molodezhnoe predprinimatelstvo v Rostovskoj oblasti: sostoyanie, problemy razvitiya i napravleniya gosudarstvennoj podderzhki [Youth entrepreneurship in the Rostov region: state, development prob- lems and directions of state support]. Molodoi uchenyi — Young scientist, 24 (104), 443–447 [in Russian].

Klassifikaciya predpriyatii [Classification of enterprises]. (n.d.). econ.wikireading.ru. Retrieved from https://econ.wikireading.ru/30202 [in Russian].

Laricheva, A.A. (2014). Molodezhnoe predprinimatelstvo kak faktor innovacionnogo razvitiya ekonomiki Rossii [Youth entrepreneurship as a factor of innovative development of the Russian economy]. XVIII Tsarskoe Selo Readings. Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferenciya — International scientific and practical confer- ence. (pp. 97–102). Saint Petersburg [in Russian].

Larchenko, A.V. (2015). Molodezhnoe predprinimatelstvo kak predmet socialnogo upravleniya: regionalnyj aspekt [Youth entrepreneurship as a subject of social management: regional aspect]. Vlast i upravlenie na Vostoke Rossii — Power and control in the East of Russia, 3 (72), 92–98 [in Russian].

Lukov, V.A. (2012). Teorii molodezhi: Mezhdisciplinarnyj analiz [Youth Theories: An Interdisciplinary Analysis].

Moscow: “Kanon+” [in Russian].

Makkonnell, K.R., & Bryu, S.L. (2020). Ekonomika: principy, problemy i politika [Economics: principles, problems and politics]. Moscow: INFRA-M [in Russian].

Manngejm, K. (2010). Izbrannoe: Diagnoz nashego vremeni [Selected: Diagnosis of Our Time]. Moscow: RAO

“Govoryashchaya kniga” [in Russian].

Muhambetova, D. E., Primbetova, S.Ch. (2020). Molodezhnoe predprinimatelstvo kak effektivnyj sposob resheniya problem molodezhnoj bezraboticy [Youth entrepreneurship as an effective way to solve the problems of youth un- employment]. The place of social sciences and humanities in the development of modern civilization.

Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferenciya (31 yanvarya 2020 goda) — International scientific and practical conference (pp. 73–35). Belgorod: OOO “Agentstvo perspektivnyh nauchnyh issledovanii” [in Russian].

Petrishche, V.I. (2015). Innovacionnaya sreda i molodezhnoe predprinimatelstvo: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya [In- novation environment and youth entrepreneurship: problems and development prospects]. Kontsept — Concept, 13, 766–770 [in Russian].

Husainova, Zh.S., & Zhartaj, Zh.M. (2020). Razrabotka metodologicheskih osnov Forsajt-modeli razvitiya molodezhnogo predprinimatelstva [Development of methodological foundations of a foresight model for the devel- opment of youth entrepreneurship]. Vestnik Karagandinskogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskaya seriya — Karaganda University Bulletin Economic Series, 97–1, 58–65 [in Russian].

Shumik, E.G., Belik, E.V., Blinov, M.P. (2017). Molodezhnoe predprinimatelstvo: problemy i puti resheniya [Youth entrepreneurship: problems and solutions]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika — Bulle- tin of Tomsk State University. Economy, 40, 11–17 [in Russian].

Shumpeter, J. A. (1982). Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Economic development theory]. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].

Zanyatost v Kazahstane. 2020: statisticheskii sbornik [Employment in Kazakhstan]. (2020). Nur-Sultan [in Russian].




Д.Н. Айтжанова, М.М. Бегентаев, С.К. Кунязова, А.А. Титков Қазақстан Республикасындағы жастар кəсіпкерлігі:

түсінігі, мəселелері жəне олардың шешілу жолдары Аңдатпа

Мақсаты: Жас ұрпақты кəсіпкерлік қызметке қосу олар үшін əсіресе, шиеленіскен COVID-19 пандемиясы кезеңінде жұмыспен қамту проблемасының шешімдерінің бірі болып табылады. Экономиканы инновациялық трансформациялау процестері үшін жастар кəсіпкерлігін дамытудың маңыздылығын ескерсек, сондай-ақ, жастардың əлеуметтік бейімделу процесін басқарудың өзектілігі, оларды шығармашылық қызметке тарту жəне жеке өзін-өзі жүзеге асыруға мүмкіндік беру, жастар кəсіпкерлігін қолдау жəне дамыту механизмі Қазақстан Республикасының əлеуметтік-экономикалық даму мəселелерін шешудің орталық элементі болып табылады деп айтуға болады. Зерттеудің мақсаты жастардың жұмыспен қамтылу проблемаларын шешуге бағытталған жастар кəсіпкерлігінің вариативті нысандары мен түрлерін анықтау мақсатында жастар жұмыссыздығының пайда болу себептерін талдау.

Əдісі: Жастар кəсіпкерлігі жұмысының себеп-салдарлық факторлары туралы жиналған теориялық жəне практикалық деректер жүйелі талдау, ақпаратты құрылымдау, гипотеза құру жəне сұрау əдістерін пайдалана отырып талданды.

Қорытынды: Жастардың құрылымдық элементтерін түсінудің ғылыми тəсілдері негізінде жастардың концептуалды мəні жүйеленді, кəсіпкерлік қызметті жүзеге асыруға бағытталған мақсатты бағдарына сəйкес қарастырылатын жастар кəсіпкерлігі тұжырымдамасына объективті көзқарас анықталды. Сондай ақ, жастар кəсіпкерлігін дамытудың себеп-салдарлық факторлары айқындалды, жастар кəсіпкерлігін негізгі түрлері бойынша жіктеу əзірленді. Сауалнама жүргізу арқылы еңбек нарығындағы жастар кəсіпкерлігін дамыту проблемаларына қатысты жағдай зерделенді жəне жастар жұмыссыздығы проблемасын шешу жолдары ұсынылды.

Тұжырымдама: Жастар кəсіпкерлігі ұғымына ғылыми көзқарастарды нақты жүйелеу, жастар арасындағы жұмыссыздық себептерін, жастар кəсіпкерлігін дамыту проблемаларын анықтау жастар мен халықты еңбек нарығында толық жұмыспен қамтуға қол жеткізу үшін жастар кəсіпкерлігінің үдемелі дамуын қамтамасыз етуге мүмкіндік береді.

Кілт сөздер: жастар, жастар кəсіпкерлігі, бизнес жəне кəсіпкерлік, кəсіпкерлік қызмет, жұмыссыздық, жұмыспен қамту, сыныптау, инновациялық белсенділік, бəсекегеқабілеттілік.

Д.Н. Айтжанова, М.М. Бегентаев, С.К. Кунязова, А.А. Титков Молодежное предпринимательство в Республике Казахстан:

понятие, проблемы и пути решения Аннотация

Цель: Включение в предпринимательскую деятельность молодого поколения является для них одним из решений проблемы трудовой занятости, особенно обострившейся в период пандемии COVID–19. Учитывая важность развития молодежного предпринимательства для процессов инновационной трансформации экономи- ки, а также актуальность управления процессом социальной адаптации молодежи, вовлечения ее в созидатель- ную деятельность и предоставления возможностей для максимальной личностной самореализации, можно ут- верждать, что механизм поддержки и развития молодежного предпринимательства является центральным эле- ментом решения проблем социально-экономического развития Республики Казахстан. Цель данного исследова- ния заключается в анализе причин возникновения молодежной безработицы с целью определения вариативных форм и видов молодежного предпринимательства, ориентированных на решение проблем занятости молодежи.

Методы: Собранные теоретические и практические данные о причинно-следственных факторах функцио- нирования молодежного предпринимательства были проанализированы с использованием методов системного анализа, структурирования информации, построения гипотез и опроса.

Результаты: На основе научных подходов к пониманию структурных элементов молодежи была система- тизирована понятийная сущность молодежи, определен объективный подход к понятию “молодежное предпри- нимательство”, которое рассмотрено в соответствии с его целевым ориентиром, направленным на осуществле- ние предпринимательской деятельности. Более того выявлены причинно-следственные факторы развития мо- лодежного предпринимательства, разработана классификация молодежного предпринимательства по основным видам. Посредством проведения опроса изучена ситуация на рынке труда относительно проблем развития мо- лодежного предпринимательства и предложены пути решения проблемы молодежной безработицы.

Выводы: Чёткая систематизация научных подходов к понятию молодежного предпринимательства, выяв- ление причин безработицы среди молодежи, проблем развития молодежного предпринимательства позволят обеспечить поступательное развитие молодежного предпринимательства для достижения полной занятости молодежи и населения на рынке труда.




Youth entrepreneurship in the Republic of Kazakhstan:…

ECONOMY Series. № 2(102)/2021 15

Ключевые слова: молодежь, молодежное предпринимательство, бизнес и предпринимательство, предпри- нимательская деятельность, безработица, занятость, классификация, инновационная активность, конкуренто- способность.


Асаул, А.Н. Организация предпринимательской деятельности [Текст]: учебник / А.Н. Асаул — СПб.: АНО ИПЭВ, 2009 — 336 с.

Ахиярова, Н.В. Социально-управленческие проблемы государственной поддержки молодежного предпринима- тельства в Республике Башкортостан [Текст]: автореф. дис. канд. социол. наук / Н.В. Ахиярова — Уфа, 2009.

— 24 с.

Как изменить мир. Социальное предпринимательство и сила новых идей [Текст] / Д. Борнштейн. — М.: Альпи- на Паблишер, 2015. — 496 с.

Ершова, Т.В. Экологическое предпринимательство: основные направления и этапы развития исследований [Текст] / Т.В. Ершова // Вестник СПбГУ. Сер. 8. Менеджмент. — 2016. — № 1. — С. 66 — 90.

Жартай, Ж.М. Қазақстандағы жастар кəсіпкерлігін дамытудың сандық жəне сапалық параметрлерін талдау [Текст] / Ж.М. Жартай // Вестник Карагандинского университета Эконом-серия. — 2019. — № 4 (96). — С. 312 — 324.

Zhartay, Z. Development of the youth entrepreneurship: Example of Kazakhstan / Z. Zhartay, Z. Khussainova, B. Yessengeldin // Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues. — 2020. — N8(1). — P. 1190 — 1208.

Жидикова, А.О. Инновационное молодежное предпринимательство как форма развития гражданского общества [Текст] / А.О. Жидикова, М.С. Ракитина // Молодежная политика и гражданское общество в современной России: сб. материалов науч.-практ. конф. Ростов н/Д, 2014. С. 45–50.

Иванова, А.В. Комплексная оценка факторов развития молодежного предпринимательства в университетской среде [Текст]: автореф. дис. канд. эконом. наук. / А.В. Иванова. — Екатеринбург, 2013. — 24 с.

Игнатов, В.И. Молодежное предпринимательство в Ростовской области: состояние, проблемы развития и на- правления государственной поддержки [Текст] / В.И. Игнатов // Молодой ученый. — 2015. — № 24 (104). — С. 443–447.

Классификация предприятий (https://econ.wikireading.ru/30202).

Ларичева, А.А. Молодежное предпринимательство как фактор инновационного развития экономики России [Текст]: материалы конференции XVIII ЦАРСКОСЕЛЬСКИЕ ЧТЕНИЯ. — СПб., 2014. С. 97–102.

Ларченко, А.В. Молодежное предпринимательство как предмет социального управления: региональный аспект [Текст] / А.В. Ларченко // Власть и управление на Востоке России — 2015. — № 3 (72). С. 92–98.

Луков, В.А. Теории молодежи: Междисциплинарный анализ [Текст] / В.А. Луков. — М.: “Канон+” РООИ “Реа- билитация”, 2012. — 528 с.

Макконнелл, К.Р. Экономикс: принципы, проблемы и политика: пер. 17-го англ. изд. [текст] / К.Р. Макконелл, С.Д. Брю. — Издательство: ИНФРА-М, 2009. — 972 с.

Маннгейм, К. Избранное: Диагноз нашего времени [Текст] / К. Маннгейм. — М.: РАО Говорящая книга, 2010.

— 744 с.

Мухамбетова, Д.Е., Примбетова, С. Ч. Молодежное предпринимательство как эффективный способ решения проблем молодежной безработицы [Текст]: // материалам Международной научно-практической конферен- ции “Место социально-гуманитарных наук в развитии современной цивилизации”. — ООО Агентство пер- спективных научных исследований (АПНИ), 2020. — С. 73–75.

Петрище, В.И. Инновационная среда и молодежное предпринимательство: проблемы и перспективы развития [Текст] / В.И. Петрище // науч.-метод. журн. “Концепт”. Т. 13. — 2015. — С. 766–770.

Khussainova, Zh.S. Development of methodological bases for the foresight model of youth entrepreneurship develop- ment / Zh.S. Khussainova, Zh.M. Zhartay // Вестник Карагандинского университета Эконом-серия — 2020. —

№ 1(97). — С. 58–65.

Шумик, Е.Г. Молодежное предпринимательство: проблемы и пути решения [Текст] / Е.Г. Шумик, Е.В. Белик, М.П. Блинов // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Экономика — 2017. — № 40. — 11 с.

Шумпетер, Й.А. Теория экономического развития [текст] / Й.А. Шумпетер — М.: Прогресс, 1982. — 385 с.

Занятость в Казахстане [Текст]: статистический сборник. — 2020. — 242 с.



Ақпарат көздері


In this article, the income of the population of the Republic of Kazakhstan is based on its assessment of the standard of living and explains what kind of income is important for the

На сегодняшний день инновационные технологии предопределяют развитие экономики в стране. В период четвертой промышленной революции немаловажным

Концепция устойчивого развития экономического субъекта должна быть раскрыта в его стратегии.. Конечная цель стратегии устойчивого развития

Постановление Правительства Республики Казахстан от 27 декабря 2019 года № 988 «Об утверж- дении Государственной программы развития образования и науки

Евразийский национальный университет имени Л.Н. Гумилева, Нур-Султан, Казахстан Зам. д.юр.н., проф.,.. Евразийский национальный университет

Abaydeldinov E.M. Doctor of Juridical Sciences, Prof., L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.. Abdilov K.S. Gumilyov Eurasian National

Согласно Кодексу Республики Казахстан об административных правонарушениях, к подсудности административных судов отно- сятся публично-правовые споры,

2 Ukaz Prezidenta Respubliki Kazakhstan «O Kontseptsii pravovoy politiki Respubliki Kazakhstan na period s 2010 do 2020 goda» ot 24 avgusta 2009g. [Decree of the President of